모욕
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) around 01:15 on February 19, 2016, around Jinju-si, on the ground that the victim D of the police officer called out after receiving a report of the pactacy, represented the position of the pacta, on the ground that the victim D represents the position of the pacta; (b) on the part of the pacta owner and the customer, etc., from the victim of the police officer called out after receiving the report of the pactacy, the Defendant: (c) 01:15 on February 19, 2016, she sawed the victim “I
The term “patently insulting the victim” and publicly insulting the victim.
2. The facts charged against the Defendant is a crime falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act and can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of this case, the victim submitted an agreement to withdraw the complaint against the Defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution against the Defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(5) of the Criminal Procedure Act.