변호사법위반
Defendant
All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.
1. No person, other than an attorney-at-law, shall provide appraisal, representation, arbitration, reconciliation, solicitation, legal consultation, preparation of legal documents, or other legal services in connection with a case in which money, valuables, entertainment, or other benefits are provided, and any person who is not an attorney-at-law shall not introduce, arrange, or induce a particular attorney-at-law in advance with respect to the acceptance of legal cases or legal services.
In December 201, 201, the Defendant asked, “I would like to keep the Defendant in custody of F,” and “I would like to know that E would have a high position in the prosecutor’s office of the public prosecutor’s office, there is a person who is aware of the position of the public prosecutor’s office, and if you want to detain F, I would not know that I would have a large-scale law firm, and should have a money.”
Accordingly, E shall appoint an able attorney-at-law to be bound by F, and the case may be resolved well, and on December 15, 201, 201, the defendant, who is located in the Cheongju-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, opened up 13 copies of a cashier's checks in H office in the Hoju-gu Special Metropolitan City on December 23, 201, deposited 5 million won in the defendant's agricultural bank account (I) at the NA Chang-dong Special Metropolitan City, Chungcheongnam-gu Special Metropolitan City Seoul Special Metropolitan City on December 23, 201, 5 million won in the above H office on January 19, 201. < Amended by Act No. 10637, Dec. 5, 2012>
Around the time of receiving the above money from the Defendant, the Defendant introduced K Attorney-at-Law in Daejeon, which was known through J, to E, paid 10 million won to the said attorney-at-law as a commission for appointment, and the remainder of 13 million won was collected from F, such as perusal of the relevant certified copy of the register and the cadastral map for the purpose of the introduction of attorneys-at-law or E, or was erroneous in the first occupational embezzlement complaint.
Forgery of private documents and display of private documents.