However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. Intrusion upon residence, theft;

A. On October 8, 2013, at around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) made preparations in advance for the murdering of the crime prevention windows installed on the window at the home of the victim D located on the second floor of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and then opened the window and intruded into the house; (b) opened the inner west digital camera, etc.; (c) opened the inner gate, etc.; and (d) cut off with five copies of the new global sales store, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 80,000,000,000, and the amount of KRW 400,000,000,000.

B. On October 8, 2013, around 11:20 on October 8, 2013, the Defendant reached the victim E’s house on the left-hand side of the first floor of the building.

After intrusion into the victim's house in the same manner as this paragraph, the victim's house and then cut off four 800,000 won in total of market prices stored in the method cremation.

2. Intrusion upon residence and attempted larceny;

A. On October 11, 2013, the Defendant came to the house of the victim D around October 11, 2013, and became one of the above 1-A.

After intrusion into the victim's house in the same manner as in the same manner, the victim's house was followed to steals objects, but stolen objects were not likely to be stolen, so that they were attempted.

B. On November 12, 2013, around 12:00, the Defendant became the victim D’s house and became the victim D’s house.

After intrusion into the victim's house in the same manner as in the same manner, the victim's house was followed to steals objects, but stolen objects were not likely to be stolen, so that they were attempted.

C. On November 12, 2013, at around 12:20, the Defendant opened a toilet window on the right side of the victim F of the first floor of the building above, which was not corrected, and intruded into the victim’s house, and subsequently, did not commit an attempted crime because there was no stolen object, even though it was behind the house in order to steals the object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspects concerning G;

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Each police statement made to F and H;

1. Investigation report (to hear victim E-mail statements);

1. The police;