On August 26, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to a disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases by night building intrusion, larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office, and on January 16, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for eight months in the Seoul Northern District Court for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Northern District Court on June 17, 2009; six months in the Seoul Northern District Court for night intrusion upon residence, larceny, and larceny; six months in the Seoul Northern District Court on June 4, 2010; six months in the imprisonment with prison labor for larceny at the Seoul Northern District Court on June 4, 2010; and six months in the Government District Court on December 16, 2010.

At around 10:45 on June 7, 2015, the Defendant came to a child care center operated by the victim D, the Defendant: (a) opened and opened an unlocked window; (b) removed 430,000 won in cash owned by the victim in the front room; and (c) stolen it from May 2014 to June 7, 2015, the Defendant attempted to steals or steals the property owned by the victims worth KRW 6.169,000 in total on 33 occasions, such as the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of F, G, H, I, K, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, andY;

1. Reports on internal investigation into victims;

1. Records of the Z Institute case, records of the AAA Institute case (Evidence No. 132 of the Evidence), records of the AC Institute case, records of the AD laundry Case, records of the AE Hospital case, records of the AE Hospital case, records of the AF cafeteria case, records of the AG dental case, and summary of the AH;

Records of the main case, the case records of AI (AI), the case records of vehicle hair(AJ), the case records of Akhhh Association case records

1. Habituality of the ruling: Criminal history records and other inquiries (A), investigation reports (Attachment of suspect A's rulings), and one copy of the ruling, and considering the fact that each criminal record of the ruling is recognized and the similar multiple crimes are repeated several times, etc., the defendant's dampness is recognized.

Application of Statutes

1. Comprehensive penal provisions of Articles 332, 331(1), 330, 329, and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;