대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On May 21, 2009, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff lent KRW 45,00,000 to the Defendant by withdrawing KRW 20,000,000 from the Agricultural Cooperative’s account under the name of the Plaintiff with a cashier’s checks and delivering them to the Defendant. On April 28, 2011, the Plaintiff lent KRW 25,00,000 to the Defendant by delivering KRW 15,00,000 among the above loans. As the Defendant paid only KRW 15,00,00,000, the Plaintiff claimed for the payment of KRW 30,000,000 and damages for delay.
2. It is not sufficient to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s assertion solely on the basis of each of the records in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including paper numbers), and each of the submission orders to provide financial transaction information to the Young Kim Kim branch of this Court, and Won Won Won Won branch of the Seoul Agricultural Cooperative, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.
Rather, in full view of each of the above evidence, evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including paper numbers) as well as the overall purport of the pleading, it is recognized as follows.
① The Plaintiff asserted that around April 201, at the Plaintiff’s complaint, four 10,00,000 cashier’s checks were withdrawn from the National Bank’s account under the Plaintiff’s name and lent three 10,000,000 won to the Defendant. On October 22, 2013, the Plaintiff withdrawn two 10,000,000 won’s cashier’s checks from the National Bank and lent 10,000 won to the Defendant. After being paid 10,00,000 won, the Plaintiff issued 10,000 won to the Defendant with her husband, and then lent 10,00,000 won to the Defendant, 200,000 won, including 10,000,000 won, 200,000 won, 200,0000 won, 200,0000,000 won, 201, 2005,201.