However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates slaughter business without permission under the trade name of “B.”

The slaughter and treatment of livestock, collection of livestock, and processing, packing, and storage of livestock products shall be conducted at a place of work permitted.

Nevertheless, from January 2015 to May 10, 2010, the Defendant was equipped with a facility for slaughter, such as scambling, painting, scambling, scambling, and chickens in a container of approximately 2 to 3 square meters located in Yasan City from May 30, 2016, with an average of 20 maris per day using the scambling season, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A ledger of disinfection log, a ledger of gold transactions at a gold-sale establishment, and a ledger of records of livestock transactions;

1. Application of B Customer and Place of Sale, and Acts and subordinate statutes of the Trading Board;

1. Relevant Article 45 (1) 1 and Article 7 (1) of the Sanitary Control of Livestock Products that are subject to criminal facts, and Articles 45 (1) 1 and 7 (1) of the same Act ( comprehensively, selection of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. It is determined as above in light of Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (a) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there are unfavorable circumstances such as the Defendant’s period of operating slaughter business without permission is shorter than the period of operation of slaughter business, but it is determined as above on the grounds that the Defendant recognized a crime and divided errors, closed the above slaughter business after the control, was a first offender, and the size of the above slaughter business is not so big).