The defendant is a person who operates the "E", an electronic commerce enterprise that sells air conditioning products, health convenience products, etc. under the name of the defendant's wife D in Suwon-si, Suwon-si C 405 213.

No trader or distributor of trade, goods, etc. shall place a false or misleading mark on the place of origin.

The Defendant, from December 31, 2013 to June 7, 2017, operated an Internet shopping mall at the above E office, “F” site, and, through the above shopping mall site, was manufactured by Ecosta Copi, Ltd., the Defendant was originating in North Korea, the country of origin of which “F tree scambane scamscam.”

The country of origin was indicated as “the country of origin” for the forest bath product.

In the facts charged, the total amount of KRW 1,450,000 was sold during the above period.

“The record reveals that the origin of the product as stated in the facts constituting an offense appears to have been mistakenly indicated as stated in the facts constituting an offense, but it is deemed that the product was not actually sold, and even if the product was corrected without amendment to the indictment, it is deemed that there would be no hindrance to guaranteeing the defendant’s right to defense. As such,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A copy of a report on communications sales business;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and subparagraphs 1-2 and 33 (4) 1 of Article 53-2 of the Act on External Trade in the Selection of Punishment, and Selection of Fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the primary offender, the background of the crime, and the fact that the product recorded in the crime appears not to have been actually sold) of the suspended sentence;