대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. According to the Plaintiff’s evidence No. 1, the Plaintiff’s mother’s transfer of KRW 16.1 million to an enterprise bank account in the name of the Defendant, from December 24, 2011 to September 17, 2012, can be acknowledged.
2. The plaintiff asserts that the above amount was lent to the defendant, and the defendant asserts that the above amount was remitted to the defendant's husband D and the dissolved sales business to a partnership with the defendant, and that it is irrelevant to the defendant.
In light of the following circumstances, Gap's evidence Nos. 2 and 3, and Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 6, which can be known by adding the whole purport of the pleading to the whole purport of the pleading, i.e., the defendant's husband registered his business under the name of the defendant and engaged in wholesale and retail business of the dry Child Products. The plaintiff was well aware of this fact as D's friendship, < Amended by Act No. 11248, Jan. 17, 2012; Act No. 11304, Jul. 1, 2013; Act No. 11873, Jul. 1, 2013; Act No. 11904, Jul. 1, 2013; Act No. 11904, Jul. 1, 2013; Act No. 11904, Feb. 1, 2013>
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.