When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 03:00 on June 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was on the street in front of the Suwonnam Police Station located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu, Suwon-si; (b) was able to pay the fare even if the Defendant was on a taxi, as if he had such intent or ability; and (c) was on the C taxi driven by the victim B, despite having no intention or ability to pay the fare.

The Defendant had the victim drive the above taxi at the above place in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan City up to the front side of the Seoul Songpa-gu Police Station and did not pay 32,980 won of taxi charges, thereby obtaining property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the former receipt of a taximeter and the balance of a debit card;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;