When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall, in using and managing a means of access, engage in any act of lending the means of access in return for payment, unless otherwise specifically provided for in any other Act.

Nevertheless, on October 17, 2018, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 3,00,000 in return for lending one physical card from a person who was not his name, and then notified him of a personal identification card directly to the person who was not his name, which is linked to the DNA bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant from the corporate street of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building C Co., Ltd.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police statements of the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a warrant of search, seizure, and verification (applicable to financial accounts) and reply data;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is the act of lending the means of access, such as this case, which facilitates crimes such as tax evasion and fraud, is serious.

In fact, the means of access in the name of the accused was used for the fraud.

The punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant shows the attitude to recognize and reflect the mistake, the history and background of the crime, the amount of damage related to the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and the environment, etc.