When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 11, 2018, the Defendant applied for a loan by deceiving the victimized company as if he would repay the loan, even if he/she did not have an intent or ability to repay the loan, even if he/she received a loan from the office of Seo-gu, Seo-gu (hereinafter “victim”) (hereinafter “victim”).

Accordingly, the damaged company decided to repay the principal and interest equally on the 15th day of each month, and the due date was October 15, 202, and loaned KRW 5,000,000 to the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the damaged company, thereby deceiving 5,000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on loan transaction, such as a complaint and a detailed statement of subscription to pension calculation, D Credit Inquiry Schedule, remittance certificate, statement of remittance, statement of transactions, determination of individual rehabilitation, and application of loan transaction agreements

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;