When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On October 15, 2016, around 04:30 on October 15, 2016, the Defendant damaged the victim’s 4th floor D’s “FMourel” operated by the victim E of the 4th floor of the Dongdong-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and damaged the victim’s horse that there is no empty room by means of decomposition and decomposition, and the victim’s market price stored in the Mourter was equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 of the market price of the victim’s possession.

2. On October 15, 2016, at around 04:50 on October 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 at the place specified in paragraph (1); (b) took one time at the police box belonging to the police station of the Ansan-gu Police Station; (c) took the Defendant’s head debt at his/her own request for presentation of identification cards by a police officer assigned to the above police box called with H; and (d) took one time at his/her own seat; and (c) took the son’s head debt at his/her own seat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the statement of each police statement made to I, H, and E;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of ordinary concurrent crimes (limited to cases where a person interferes with the execution of each official duty);

1. Selection of each selective fine for punishment - The defendant has no record of committing any crime against the defendant, and the defendant shows an attitude to seriously reflect the crime of this case, each of the damaged public officials deposited one million won for each offense, and the fact that it appears to be an contingent crime, shall be considered.

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.