On September 11, 2010, the Defendant issued KRW 4,336,00,00 from the above date to the Defendant’s national bank account on the same day from the victim F (30 years of age) to the 25th day of the same month by inserting an article to the effect that “D” in the Defendant’s operation of the Spanju-gun, Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant sold heavy and toys to 50% of the 50% of the 30% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 50% of the 12th day of the 12th day of the 201st day of the same month, as in the list of crimes in the attached list.

2. Since G, an employee of the defendant and his defense counsel, went to the toy room operated by the defendant, he could not deliver articles to the victims because he had escaped, and there was no deceiving the victims.

3. Therefore, the defendant failed to secure goods at the time of receiving orders from the complainants, and the complainants did not have the intent or ability to deliver the goods to the complainants, and there are statements and transfer confirmations as to whether they correspond to the facts charged in the instant case. However, the contents of the above evidence are mainly about the situation in which the complainants did not receive the goods from the defendant, and the contents of the above evidence are about the fact that the complainants did not receive the goods from the defendant and the fact that the complainants deposited the goods to the defendant, and not direct evidence

On the other hand, since the time when the defendant received orders from the complainant was immediately before the delay (from September 21, 2010 to September 23, 201), the defendant may send a door-to-door assignment.