If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

A. On September 10, 2012, at around 01:30 on September 10, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s bar business of the victim E (54 years and women), a main agent of his business, by force, by fluoring around 30 minutes of a disturbance, on the ground that he was fluorily fluored by fluoring a more fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’

B. The Defendant assaulted the victim D, who is an employee of the act of “A. A. Port”, with his/her marith’s hand, on 2-3 occasions, such as the 2-3 holdter.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and D;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business and the selection of fines) and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the selection of fines) of the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.