If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On November 9, 2013, around 22:15, the Defendant demanded to refund the brea value, which was not calculated as the victim C (n, 55 years of age), under the influence of alcohol in the breabb house operated by the victim C (n, n, and 5 years of age), and the Defendant demanded to refund the brea value, which was not calculated as the victim, from the victim by avoiding the disturbance.

In the case of the luxing of the audience, the victim was blicked with the head of the body with the lubing hand, and the victim was assaulted at one time by her hand at the hand floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Investigative reports - Preparation of, and reporting on, recording notes, and the application of statutes;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.