When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 24, 2018, at around 16:30 on October 24, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at a police box located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance over about 30 minutes, such as: (b) while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant complained of the disturbance that was punished by the crime of interference with business in connection with the crime of interference with business at the hospital; (c) while entering the said police box and working for the police station, “snick shall not be a police officer; (d)”, “b)”, and “satisfes”, and “satfes”, and “satchfes” and “satfes”, and satf

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, had a very rough and disorderly speech or behavior at a public office in the public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. The circumstantial statement of the offender;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines for the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Comprehensively taking account of the witness’s statement at this court, which is the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, as well as the evidence submitted by the prosecution, the Defendant would raise KRW 300,000 of the fine amount notified in the summary order of this case in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the denial of the instant crime, even though the Defendant fully recognizes the facts of the instant crime, etc.