부가가치세등부과처분취소[국승]
Disposition Imposing Value-Added Tax
Appropriateness of a disposition imposing deposits and delivery fees on the Plaintiff’s income;
The contents of the judgment are the same as attachment.
2016Nu79016 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax, etc.
*
Masan Tax Office et al.
on October 29, 2017
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. Costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. On May 12, 2014, the director of the tax office of Msan shall revoke the judgment of the plaintiff 2010
The imposition of each value-added tax on KRW 18,083,940, KRW 20,270, KRW 23,000, KRW 110, and KRW 10,953, and KRW 100, which shall accrue for the year 2012, and the imposition of each global income tax on KRW 22,906,01, KRW 010, KRW 3,441,710, and KRW 50,473, and KRW 130, which shall accrue for the year 2012, shall be revoked. The imposition of each global income tax on KRW 235,710,00, which shall accrue for the Plaintiff on March 1, 2014 by the head of the relevant high-sea tax office is revoked. The imposition of each global income tax on KRW 22,90,00, KRW 235,500, which shall accrue for the year 2014.
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows. Thus, it is cited by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Parts to be added
○ It is difficult to say that the 4th 16th eth eth 18th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e
In addition, "the same shall apply)" shall be added.
2. Conclusion
Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit.