beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고정311

도시및주거환경정비법위반

Text

Defendant

A A Fines of 1,00,000, Defendant B and C of each fine of 700,000,000 won, Defendant D and E of each fine of 50,000,00 won;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around June 20, 2010, a person appointed as the president of “F” in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government J, Defendant B as a full-time director of the said union, Defendant C as a business director of the said union, Defendant D and E as an auditor of the said union, and Defendant F (hereinafter “F”) as of December 1, 201 after obtaining authorization for establishment from the head of Eunpyeong-gu Office with the approval of establishment from the head of Eunpyeong-gu on December 29, 201.

Where a cooperative is established for a housing redevelopment improvement project, the executives of the cooperative shall borrow funds, use the rearrangement project costs, or conclude a contract to become a partner's burden in addition to the matters prescribed by the budget, obtain a resolution from the general

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A, C, and B;

A. The Defendants conspired to borrow a total of KRW 20 million from Defendant A, and KRW 30 million from C and B, respectively, on or around December 201, 201, with the borrowing period from December 2, 2011 to April 201, the said FF association’s office as each obligee, as the debtor, and the said F association’s lending period from December 2, 201 to April 201, and did not undergo the resolution of the general meeting.

B. On April 26, 2012, the Defendants conspired to enter into a facility security service contract with the head of (ju) K representative L and 5 million won service cost to the resident general meeting scheduled to hold on April 28, 2012, and did not undergo a resolution by the general meeting.

2. Joint criminal conduct of Defendant A, C, B, D, and E;

A. The Defendants conspired, around April 16, 2012, entered into an OS service contract with the effect that the Defendants will pay 150,000 won per day to 39 persons, including M, etc. for public relations affairs and written resolution of the general meeting scheduled to be held on April 28, 2012, and paid KRW 79 million for service expenses.

B. On July 9, 2012, the Defendants conspired to obtain a resolution at a general meeting of the said F Association office.