1. On November 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) demanded B to make a false statement against his memory in the front corridor of the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 9, the Seoul Eastern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Eastern District Court”); (b) demanded B, who was singing in the singing room operated on April 5, 2014, to the effect that “I will play together with the person who was originally known, rather than by singing in the singing room operated on April 5, 2014; and (c) allowed B to make a false statement against his memory.

Accordingly, at around 16:00 on November 11, 2014, B took an oath after attending as a witness of the case of violation of the Music Industry Promotion Act against the above court No. 2014, 1088, 1246 (Joint) at the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 9, the Seoul Eastern District Court No. 404, Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, as of November 11, 2014; and thereafter, B took an oath against the prosecutor’s "the witness" at the "C" singing practice located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, as of April 5, 2014.

I have the honor to discuss the question ", not in letter, but in that way, I have been aware of it before."

The prosecutor stated that “A witness shall receive KRW 30,00 won per hour at the singing room” and stated that “I shall receive the taxi expenses from each other after playing in the singing room,” and that “E shall answer to the question “I shall do not have to do so by singing in the singing room,” and then, the prosecutor made a statement to the effect that “I shall answer to the question “I shall not have to have the witness done by singing in the singing room, and I shall answer to the question “I shall have to have the witness come to know when I had to drink in the instant singing box for a long time at the E and the instant singing room,” and the attorney’s answer to the question “I have to have the witness become aware of each other in the instant singing box.”

However, in fact, B was working in the above singing room at the time, and E was also a man who was working in the singing room.

Therefore, the defendant caused B to make a false statement contrary to his memory, thereby instigating B with perjury.

2. The Defendant who instigated perjury to F. F. On April 2015, 2015, the Defendant is against F. F. “F. on March 29, 2014”