However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 31, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million from the Suwon District Court's Busan District Court's Busan Branch to a fine of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 3 million from the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch to the same crime on September 14, 2012.

On November 22, 2013, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven a low alcohol vehicle with alcohol level of 0.057% under the influence of alcohol level, without obtaining a driver’s license from around 150 meters from the roads near the additional digital center in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the roads in front of 959-23, the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstances of drinking drivers, and notification of the control results of drinking driving;

1. A driver's license inquiry;

1. Previous records: Application of inquiry reports on criminal records, etc. and investigation reports (Attachment of judgment)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant drives a motor vehicle without a license even though he/she had the same drinking driving skills twice in the state of drinking, in light of the fact that he/she drives a motor vehicle without a license in the state of drinking, his/her criminal liability is unlimited, but the defendant acknowledges the facts charged in this case and shows his/her attitude to reflect his/her mistake, again, there is no record of punishment higher than a fine, and there is no record of punishment higher than a fine, and other circumstances shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, etc.