[Criminal Power] The Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Railroad Safety Act at the Seoul Central District Court on January 25, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 2, 2013, and is still under probation.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who has no fixed dwelling and occupation.

On April 18, 2013, around 07:42, the Defendant sought to the 4th Do calendar, Seoul Special Judicial Police Team E-Center in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, for the fourth floor of the D Station in Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and used the Defendant’s complaint that the Defendant had been posted to a summary judgment while doing fling in the said D Station, and she expressed the desire to “drawb, i.e., why he did so, I am?” and her life at the face of F, who is a railroad police officer working at that place, she flick, and flicked the said F that he saw the Defendant, and she flicked the flick with flick and flicked the flick and flick the b

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of the order of railroad facilities of the above F who is railroad workers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Photographss of damaged parts, and photographs of disturbing the damaged part of a suspect A, which he/she had inflicted on the victim;

1. The CCTV closure screen;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, copies of suspects' rulings, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing inquiry into case agreements;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 78(1) and 49(2) of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes have been sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime at least four months thereafter, and the instant crime was committed by committing the crime, and the nature of the crime is not very good, and the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim up to now, in light of the following: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same crime; (b) the Defendant again committed the instant crime; and (c) the instant crime was committed by the commission of the crime