However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 19, 2016, around 22:27, the Defendant reported to 112, at the front of the management office of 107-dong Aart-ro 107, a dry field 371, a dry field-ro, a dry field-ro 10:27, the Defendant: (a) reported to 112; and (b) was required to return home from C in the situation where the security guard and the Sinsan Police Station B of the Masan-si, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was under the desire to return home, and (c) was snicked several times.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the statement protocol law to C prepared by the police;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended sentence] that there is no person [the person subject to special sentencing] in the basic area (six months to one year and four months] (the decision of the sentenced sentence] [the person subject to special sentencing] 6 months of imprisonment, the suspended sentence of one year (the fact that one's mistake is recognized and reflected, the fact that there is no past record of the suspended sentence or higher, the one does not repeat the crime that obstructs the performance of official duties again.

C. Taking into account the fact that C does not want the punishment of the defendant