beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.22 2017고단2141

업무방해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2016, the Defendants conspired and did not bear the obligation to pay insurance money related to traffic accident damage suffered by Defendant A on or around December 1998. However, as Seoul Gangnam-gu, the victim’s office building located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 382, “Meatts are 18 years after the accident occurred,” and the ordinary people died;

At the same time, from November 11, 2016 to November 11, 2016, up to 98 times, the victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts in the same manner, and at the same time spreads false facts, thereby hindering the customer attraction work of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Each judgment (verification of non-existence of a debt), photographs of the present state of demonstration, press reports, noise measuring instruments, pictures of noise, occupancy status, statement of provisional disposition decision [the Defendants’ contents indicated on the PPP and PPs posted by them are not false but false, and they did not have any intention to defame or obstruct the victimized company. However, the victimized company filed a lawsuit against Defendant A on January 24, 2003 against Defendant A to confirm the non-existence of an insurance claim with respect to the damage of traffic accidents suffered by Defendant A on December 10, 2004 and obtained a final and conclusive judgment in favor of Defendant A on January 24, 2003, the victimized company did not bear the obligation to pay insurance money to Defendant A in relation to the above traffic accident; Defendant B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for up to two years on December 10, 204 due to defamation and obstruction of business affairs demanding compensation as in this case; Defendant B’s act of defamation and infringement of reputation of Seoul District Court on January 9, 2017.