A. In the misapprehension of the legal principle, the defendant has a habit of gambling.

However, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to habitual gambling and thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment, as stated in its reasoning.

B. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. According to the legal principles of habitual gambling, habitual gambling 5 months constitute a crime of gambling and repeated gambling 206Do736 delivered on October 23, 2008, the offender’s nature is considered. However, in determining the existence of such habits, prior records and frequency of gambling are important data. However, even if gambling has not been committed, if gambling 5dogggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg.