1. On February 2010, the Defendant committed fraud on February 2, 2010: (a) on the part of the Defendant’s office located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) “The principal shall be repaid once a year; and (c) the interest shall be paid five million won per month from the following month.”

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant was bad credit holders and there was no special income, and it was difficult to regard the factory of China, which was equipped with only the facilities and actually produced and sold products. Therefore, even if the defendant borrowed the money from the injured party, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the Defendant: (a) deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim on February 17, 2010; (b) KRW 27 million to the account under the name of the Defendant on February 18, 2010; (c) KRW 10 million to the account under the name of the Defendant on February 18, 2010; and (d) around March 9, 2010 to the account remitted by the actual victim of the corporate account under the name of the ChineseF on or around March 9, 2010 to the account designated by the Defendant.

Ro-ro 11,464,718 won is remitted, and the "1,525,282 won indictment" in the indictment of KRW 1,535,282 appears to be written by the victim to G who is the defendant's seat.

A. The date when the victim paid KRW 100 million to A on March 12, 2010, which was transferred to a corporate account under the name of H around March 12, 2010, is the date when the victim paid KRW 100 million to A, and the date when 100 million was deposited into a “corporate M” as a corporation actually established, is March 19, 2010.

2. On April 16, 2010, the Defendant committed fraud at around April 16, 2010, at the J hotel located in Chinese roadside I, “only when it is necessary to purchase a vehicle for business use of Chinese F, it may receive money from the customer and pay interest on the borrowed money.”

On October 15, 2010, the vehicle purchase fund of KRW 30 million shall be lent, and it shall be repaid until October 15, 2010.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the damaged person for the same reasons as the preceding paragraph.

The defendant is the victim as above.