1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant A’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable in finding the Defendant guilty of all of the Defendant’s charges of fraud (excluding the part not guilty in the grounds of appeal) against the victim I, on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment below as to Defendant B’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds as stated in its holding, and there was no error of finding the facts beyond the bounds of the principle

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.