except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who drives B cargo vehicles in the line of duty.

around 19:25 on October 6, 2012, when the Defendant drives the above cargo vehicle on the road at the Scambro-dong at the time of Gyeonggi-do, the Defendant was obliged to drive in drinking condition, and the Defendant had a duty of care to safely proceed in accordance with the new subparagraph. Nevertheless, without a driver’s license, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at the speed of 0.163%, was entering the intersection at the speed of the stop, sent to the left-hand turn at both sides according to the new subparagraph due to the occupational negligence, which entered the speed of 0.163% under the influence of alcohol at the speed of the stop, the Defendant shocked the victim C (54 years old, 54 years old)’s driving of the car at the speed of 19:25 hours, and carried out an interview at the same time with the victim’s 6th day of repair and injury of the said car at the same time, and the Defendant did not take measures to repair the said car at the same level for the above 3th day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. E statements;

1. Any drinking driver, any report on proper driving, or any drinking-free store;

1. A traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Each written diagnosis, written estimate, or certificate of acceptance of scrapping;

1. Application of the statutes on the register of driver's licenses;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime.