2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

1. On October 201, the Defendant committed a crime related to the freezing business costs of the freezing-gun: (a) to the victim E, a son, who is located in D operated by the mother of the Defendant in Thai-gun, Thai-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; (b) “Woo-gun, a freezing-gun business would be subsidized from the Thai-gun and the Ministry

It is easy to obtain permission, and if the cost of the business is borne, it is intended to purchase the freezing warehouse site and to have the freezing warehouse business with the approval and permission.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party as the cost of freezing warehouse business, he was thought to use it as the business fund of F corporation operated by the defendant, so there was no intention or ability to allow the injured party to operate freezing warehouse business.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received directly from the victim of the damage, the purchase price of 1303 square meters of forest land G in Chungcheongnam-nam, Chungcheongnam-do, which is owned by the victim, from the purchaser, and was permitted to use the purchase price for the expenses for freezing warehouse business, and received from the purchaser H on December 2, 2011 and received KRW 50 million on December 19, 201 from the purchaser H.

In addition, on December 23, 2011, the defendant received 300 million won from the injured party to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant as the expenses for freezing warehouse business.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On March 2012, the Defendant, who committed a crime related to the cost of construction of a fish farm and a new house, was demanded by the injured party to return money paid as a cost to the crypt warehouse business, and was willing to acquire money additionally by proposing a new business to the injured party.

Accordingly, the Defendant purchased a 4,430 square meters of forest land in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the land owned by the Defendant in September 2012 and live in a farming business.

Until now, the costs are appropriated for the purchase price of land, and the cost of housing construction is authorized to face-to-face.