On November 8, 2017, at around 23:08, the Defendant posted an article on the victim D, known as a female victim of sexual assault case, posted on the Internet B, “Isk snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick snick.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning data by cutting off Bsite news news articles, writing comments and comments;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day converted);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act) (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act provides that the victim’s comments posted by the defendant are not immediately specified, but the main text of the comments posted by the defendant is that women who are not wholly related to the victim