However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 27, 2014, at around 12:40, the Defendant requested the police to report to the Defendant, domestic violence, after entering the Defendant’s house located in Ulsan-gu C apartment 511, and the Defendant, who had come out of a locking place, caused by the misunderstanding that the Defendant had faced with the male house and the wind. The Defendant, who was living together with the misunderstanding, was at the time of the Defendant’s knives with the male house and the wind.

피고인은 같은 날 12:50경 위 아파트 옥상에서 위와 같이 신고를 받고 피해사실을 확인하기 위해 출동한 울산동부경찰서 D파출소 소속 E(35세) 경장에게 “옆집 남자 때문에 동거남과 싸웠다, 옆집 남자를 체포해서 옥상으로 데려와라”라고 요구하다가, E의 설득에 의해 피고인의 집으로 다시 내려간 이후에도 계속하여 옆집 남자를 체포해 오지 않는다며 소란을 피우던 중, E이 피고인의 요구를 들어주지 않는다는 이유로 안방 바닥에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 식칼(칼날길이 16cm, 총길이 29cm)을 손에 집어 들고 "씨팔, 좃 같네, 왜 요구조건을 들어주지 않는데"라고 말하며 E을 향해 위 식칼을 1회 휘둘러 E을 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Order to Attend Courses;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture is [determination of types] : the obstruction of performance of official duties / coercion of official duties (special person] on January 1, 01, 201.