However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant was in de facto marital relationship with the victim B.

1. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 15:00 on July 6, 2017, at the D office located in Daejeon Middle-gu, Daejeon, the victim was faced with the victim’s face by drinking the victim’s seat; (b) was driving the victim’s arms; and (c) was sected with the victim’s arms for about two weeks; and (d) was sected with acute sects and sected with the victim in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. On July 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) around 15:0 on July 14, 2017, the victim saw the victim’s face as a scamhypt; (b) took the victim’s hump to the victim’s face; (c) taken the victim’s hump to the bottom beyond the floor; and (d) took the victim’s hump to the victim’s hump over the floor, thereby causing injury, such as salt, tension,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of each diagnosis document, photograph, and response statute to investigation prior to decision;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment by imprisonment, and the choice of applicable criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and attendance order;

1. Where the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] [the range of recommended punishment] is reduced range of category 1 (the general injury period between February and one year] (the punishment of a person subject to special mitigation], non-members of punishment (including serious efforts to recover damage), or considerable damage has been restored;

2. The decision of sentence shall be made in the same way as the order, in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant commits a mistake, that the victim has attended the court and sought the wife of the defendant, and that only two minor fines have been served for the same crime;