However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On January 20, 2019, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) on January 20, 2019, at the entrance and exit of the D convenience store operated by the victim C (V, 57 years of age) in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) on the part of the victim, the Defendant was requested by the victim to have tobacco smoked at the entrance and exit of the D convenience store operated by the victim C (V, 57 years of age).

(zv) make an oral report to the Gu office, as well as to know-how;

The term "I wish" and "I will not continue funeral services".

2. On January 20, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the convenience store business of the victim by force for about 20 minutes, such as intending to see the victim by drinking drinking after drinking at the convenience store, and intending to do so. On January 20, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force. On January 20, 201, at around 04:01, the convenience store as indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant committed the act of paragraph (1) at the convenience store, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business. On January 20, 201, the Defendant of the obstruction of the performance of official duties: (a) the police officer, the police officer at the G police station for the Gyeonggi Sungnam Change Police Station E box, who is a police officer at the convenience store, assigned to the scene by 112 report via the emergency bell of the said convenience store, to report

“........” The F’s body is tightly sealed twice by shoulder, knife his hand with his lock, and the above police officers have a knife.

"To the end, the above police officers threatened the above police officers, and the plastic boxes outside the above convenience points were collected from the above G, and they were in line with the item of the above G.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, F and G;

1. Each investigation report (including attachment of field photographs, CCTV portable phone activation CDs, video outputs, etc.) and defense counsel denied the crime, but the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is examined.