When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 26, 2016, at around 23:30, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s taxi operation duties by force for approximately 20 minutes, including: (a) the victim who laid a match without calculating the taxi fee on the ground that C (the 60-year-old and South) was infinite, the victim, who was the victim, was deprived of the taxi fee; (b) the victim who laid the match; and (c) the victim who laid the match; and (d) the victim who laid off the match and attached it, and forced him/her to cut off the cab and bbbbbbbbling m

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are against the defendant, and the defendant has agreed with the victim smoothly.