A shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Defendant

A shall complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours against A.

(2018 Gohap 74)

1. On August 5, 2017, Defendant A puts down a phrase “day” on around 23:00 on the part of Defendant A (e.g., deceptive scheme) of the Victim C (F., 16 years of age) and contact the victim. On August 6, 2017, Defendant A tried to put the victim into the Ecom Fho Lake at around 01:00, with the victim, around 01:0, in order to put the victim in the victim, and the victim was able to look at the victim’s knife and knife the knife and knife the knife, and the same shall apply to any other thing.

“ Even though I expressed his intention of refusal while speaking, I exceeded and powered the victim’s boom, and inserted Defendant A’s sexual organ into the victim’s sexual organ and added it into the victim’s sexual organ.

As a result, Defendant A had sexual intercourse with a child or juvenile by force.

2. On September 13, 2017, Defendant A forced to contact the victim C (the victim 16 years of age) through D Messenger at around 23:29 on September 13, 2017, Defendant A would be aware of the fact that he/she had sexual intercourse with the victim’s male father-gu unless he/she sent the victim’s pictures, such as buckbuck paper and her chest.

In other words, 6 copies of the victim's pictures, such as buckbucks and chests, have been transmitted from the victim of the bucking damage.

As a result, Defendant A threatened the victim with an act of non-performance of obligation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. A protocol concerning the police and suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Stenographic records;

1. Judgment on the defendant's assertion of innocence of crime place

1. In relation to the crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (e.g., deceptive scheme) against children, the defendant only had sexual intercourse with the victim and did not exercise the victim's power.

The victim's statement, the only direct evidence corresponding to this, is difficult to believe.

2. In determining the credibility of a victim’s statement in support of the facts charged, the judgment court either gives rise to the reasonableness, logical, inconsistency, or empirical rule of the content of the statement itself, or evidence or evidence.