beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.03.03 2012가단158042

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 11, 2006, the Plaintiff was provided medical treatment as a member of the Defendant’s “Cental Department” in order to treat non-conformity.

원고는 내원 당시 반대교합 부정교합 중 아래턱뼈가 많이 발달되어 앞으로 나와 있는 경우로 일명 ‘주걱턱’인 경우가 많다.

Over the 1st century(14,24) on the upper right side of the upper right and the second mouth(45) on the right side of the upper right were in a state of prior loss.

On August 22, 2006, the defendant treated the plaintiff on August 2, 2006, and found the result of the diagnosis that "alley level 1 (class 3 tendency)" is an illegal comparison, and decided to plant the eggs by maintaining the space on the part of the above tax deficit in addition to the correction treatment.

B. On January 12, 2009, the Plaintiff received medical treatment on a regular basis each month after the commencement of correctional treatment, and thereafter, on January 12, 2009, the distance between internal source and internal source was not determined until August 30, 2010, including internal source, as of June 12, 2009.

On May 18, 2012, the Defendant completed the correction treatment with the Plaintiff. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant discovered absorption of the lower court’s portion of the 3 Daegu District Court (No. 47 U.S.) on the right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right, and transferred

C. On May 26, 2012, the medical doctor in charge of the oral surgery of the dental hospital of the Gyeong-hee University issued the Plaintiff a hives of the 3 Daegu (48 dentalian) and the chronic infection diagnosis No. 47 on the right-hand side of the hives of the hives and the hives of the hives of the hives of the hives.

In addition, as a result of the examination of the plaintiff's 14, 24, and 45 on the part of the dental loss, the parts 24 are not good, so it is impossible to establish a crypt, additional correction is required in order to solve this problem, and it is necessary to conduct an operation to correct the crypt in order to resolve the crypt problem, and the crypt was planted on the part of 45 and 47.

The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s University.