beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.10.27 2015구단56147

요양불승인결정 취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 7, 2013, the Plaintiff was a person who worked as a delivery source at “C” store operated by Nonparty B, and was injured by the Plaintiff, such as “foreign cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery”, “undertakeal cerebral cerebral Bribery damage,” “undertakeal cerebral Bribery damage,” “undertakeal cerebral Bribery damage,” “undertakeal cerebral Bribery damage,” “undertakeal cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery damage,” “undertakeal cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Bribery,” “mathal leth,” and “sal mast maf,” in front of the second line of the G High School located in the F in both cities of Gyeonggi-do.

B. On April 1, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant accident constituted occupational accidents, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant. However, on May 15, 2015, the Defendant rendered a decision not to grant medical care (the instant disposition was conducted under the following) on the ground that it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff was performing duties at the time of the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1 to 3, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. (1) At the time of the instant accident, the Plaintiff’s assertion (1) had been used by the Plaintiff at the time of the instant accident for the delivery, and the Plaintiff’s business owner, B, a business owner, finished the Plaintiff’s leaving-of-the-job relationship with late time, allowed the Plaintiff to leave from the office and leave the office. In lieu of the Plaintiff’s work hours, the Plaintiff allowed the Plaintiff to park the instant off-to-land to a H apartment near G High School when the Plaintiff was able to use it for business.

Thus, the accident of this case is recognized as a business relation since it occurred in the course of moving the H apartment ordered by the business owner to use the Yabab in the business of this case.

(2) The instant accident is recognized as directly related to the business of the Plaintiff.