2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflects his mistake; the Defendant does not seem to have committed the instant crime under a conclusive perception of the substance and appearance of the singish crime; and the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment in the Republic of Korea.

However, in light of the method and contents of the crime by which the defendant took part in the collection and delivery of money from the victims of the crime by acquiring money from the victims, the crime of this case is very poor in the nature of the crime in light of the method and contents of the crime, etc., the crime of Bosing is hard to crack down because the crime of Bosing is a secret and organized act, and it is not easy to recover the damage, and its social harm is very significant; the damage collected by the defendant exceeds approximately KRW 76 million; the damage was not recovered; the damage was not recovered; the defendant was not used by the victims; the defendant was the age, career, character, character, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and the sentencing of the similar case like the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence against the defendant is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.