2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s previous conviction, the motive and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable, considering the following: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime under the same multiple methods during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime; (b) the Defendant, even though not making efforts to recover from damage even though the amount of money obtained by deception, has escaped during the investigation process without making efforts to recover damage; and (c) the victim wanted to punish the Defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.