beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2020.06.29 2020고단64

사기등

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 16, 2019, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Jeonju District Court’s Military Accounting Branch on August 16, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 6, 2020.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendants conspired to acquire loans by deceiving the lending company as if C would normally obtain a loan by using the means of self-certification, such as cellular phone, C’s identification card, etc., which was based on the premise that Defendant B paid a fare to a police officer on July 2017.

Accordingly, on September 2017, 2017, Defendant B issued a certificate of authorized identification with the name of C using the above security card, and then opened the bank account under the name of C (G) in the name of C, by saying, “The Association, which is located in the vicinity of the World War (Seoul) to request the participation of the party to participate in solar solar projects through a agricultural corporation,” in accordance with the direction of Defendant A, Defendant B received a passbook or security card connected to the D Association account in the name of C, and Defendant A received a certificate of authorized identification with the assistance of A E, and again opened the F Bank account (G) in the name of C.

Then, on September 8, 2017, at the I Office of the Agricultural Corporation, H, Inc., Ltd. located in Y, Defendant A applied for a loan in the name of the victim J Co., Ltd., by entering C’s personal information into the Internet site (K). On the same day, Defendant B received the victim’s personal identification call from the non-employee belonging to the victim Co., Ltd. and took place as C.

However, in fact, the Defendants applied for a loan by using the name of C without permission, even if they received a loan from the victim, there was no particular income, and Defendant A was liable for an individual debt covering KRW 80,000,000 as a bad credit holder, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt as agreed to by the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the victim as above and transferred KRW 23,00,000 from the victim to the above FF Bank account in the name of C on the same day.