2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below also asserted the same purport as the argument in the above grounds for appeal, and the court below rejected the defendant's argument and found the defendant's argument on the ground that D may sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant arranged to provide a loan as stated in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment of the court below, although D had an memory for a loan at the court of the court below, it is stated to the effect that it would have been locked in the show thereafter, but E accompanied at the time stated that it was a woman after the president who entered a singing room, and that E had calculated a singing service charge including its expenses. However, if it appears that the contents are specific and reasonable, and the amount approved as a use fee for singing and E was born, the court below rejected the defendant's argument and found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case.

B. The court below found the following facts and circumstances in accordance with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e.,, “E visiting with D as a customer at the time of the instant case with D” in the court of the court below to the effect that “E, with D at the time of the instant case, was playing for three hours in singing and dancing together with D, as the Defendant’s next female at the time of the instant case, and 2 hours were calculated by D, one hour, and the amount calculated by the principal himself, including expenses for singing and dancing as the Defendant’s next female, such as the Defendant’s late-time women. In ordinary, if the two persons live in singing, they would have 10,000 won at the time of cash settlement, and 120,000 won at the time of credit card settlement.” The statement was made to the effect that the statement is considerably specific and reliable, and ② it was settled on the day of the instant case.