도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that an employee A of the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of a vehicle of a road management authority by operating B truck with freight loaded with freight exceeding 1.1 ton of total weight exceeding 1.1 ton of total weight exceeding 1.1 tons at the net river business office of the Korea Highway Corporation, which was located in the 600-3 in the documentary voltage of 13:40 on November 27, 2003 at the time of net voltage of 60-3.
However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions to the facts charged in this case, provides that "where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation." The Constitutional Court decision 2010Hun-Ga38 of Oct. 28, 2010 and the proviso of Article 47 (2) of the Constitutional Court Act, which is the applicable provisions to the facts charged in this case, has retroactively lost its effect.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.