If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

In fact, the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she received an order for drinking, al., at around 05:00 on August 9, 2013, the Defendant obtained financial benefits equivalent to 130,000 won, such as Macju (50,000 won), Macju (50,000 won), Macju (50,000 won), Macju (50,000 won), and Macju (30,000 won), and Docju (130,000 won), since he/she did not make an order for drinking, and did not pay the price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the second protocol of trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in a statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;