If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Around 2012, the Defendant had a mind to forge a written move-in report in the name of B without the consent of B in order to directly rear her husband B who had been brought up by her husband B before the divorce.

1. On January 2, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) indicated “B” in the “household name column” with fences attached to the move-in report form kept therein; (b) indicated “E” in the “resident registration number column; and (c) indicated “F apartment G in the “resident registration number column” in the “resident registration number column”; and (d) affixed B seal prepared in advance on the “household name column” and “resident registration number column.”

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the move-in report in the name of B, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact for the purpose of exercising.

2. The Defendant at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) submitted a written move-in report under B, which was forged, to the employee of the above community service center under the name-free circumstance, as if the written move-in report was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the police protocol protocol law to B

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.