However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 8, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) (hereinafter “C”), at around 16:00, the Defendant paid 170,000 won in cash to the business owners under his/her name, in exchange for the price of sexual traffic, and committed sexual intercourse with D who are female employees.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) operated the commercial sex acts from around December 19, 2016 to February 15, 2017 with the trade name “F” on the building E at Sinnam-si and the fourth floor of “F”. On January 25, 2017, the Defendant arranged sexual intercourse with the said G in return for receiving 2.60,000 won in cash from G as the price for commercial sex acts and arranging the sexual intercourse with D, who is female employees, on the condition that 1.60,000 won in cash are allocated among them. During the said period, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts by employing four female employees to engage in commercial sex

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each police interrogation protocol of D or G;

1. Copy of the statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Hma advertising model pictures and photographs, investigation reports (the details of telephone conversations with I for reference) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, etc., Articles 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act regarding community service order;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. provides that the defendant does not have criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines for the reason of sentencing, and the defendant has shown his attitude to confession and reflect the crime from the early stage of the investigation, and the defendant must not do such illegal act again.