2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. Defendant B is a person who treated and performed a surgery for the Plaintiff as follows, and Defendant C and D are the users of Defendant B who opened and operated the F Hospital Seoul Southern Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. The Plaintiff was treated by the Defendant B on May 22, 2013, as the Plaintiff was enrolled in the Defendant Hospital, while receiving hyeological treatment and physical therapy from G and H E and H E and, as such, hyeopic pain, left-hand pain, and walking disorder were not improved.

At the time when the plaintiff was admitted to the defendant hospital, the plaintiff was able to buck both sides, and buckbucks with more severe left side.

On the other hand, there were no symptoms such as low-forest symptoms and the right shoulder, and there were symptoms such as low-forest and petation when walking.

C. On May 28, 2013, the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant Hospital for surgery. At the time, as a result of the MRI’s inspection on the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff showed that it constitutes an evaluative evaluative evaluative evaluative evaluantism Nos. 3-4, 4-5, 4-5, 2-3-4-5, and 3-6, 3-4-5-6, along with the evaluative evaluative evaluation.

On May 29, 2013, the Plaintiff undergone an operation (OLD, openll lbercey, hereinafter “instant primary operation”) with respect to the 4-5 Scams in the U.S. S., and discharged the Plaintiff on June 3, 2013.

E. At the time of discharge on June 20, 2013, the Plaintiff promised to carry out the post-presidential surgery (2-3, 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6) on the 21st day of the same month at the time of discharge. Around June 10, 2013, the Plaintiff asked the Defendant hospital for a phone call at the Defendant hospital on the ground that there was a fluorial fluor, the right side side of the pre-fluorcing frame, and that the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as protruding, protruding, provoking, provoking, provoking, provoking, provokingddd, the right shoulder-pumd, and the left end fluoration of the left side.

F. On June 13, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital inspected the Plaintiff, and the result showed 2.3.