beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.10.29 2013고단4348

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 28, 2013, at around 01:10 on June 28, 2013, Defendant A and D co-principaled with Defendant A and D, while engaging in a dispute with the victim G (n, 48 years of age) at the “F cafeteria” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Bupyeong-gu, Seoul, Defendant A was able to take head and face by drinking and hand, and D was sicking the victim’s head debt by hand.

As a result, Defendant A, in collaboration with D, inflicted injury on the victim, such as brain salvy in need of treatment for about 14 days.

2. The Defendants and D’s co-principal offenders met the victim H (the age of 48) at the time and place of the preceding paragraph along with D, on the ground that the victim H (the age of 48) met the assault against G, and Defendant B took the victim’s face one time at drinking, D took the victim’s head debt, and the Defendants took the victim out of the restaurant by attaching the victim’s head, face, etc. out of the restaurant. The Defendants continued to take the victim’s head, face, etc. out of the restaurant by drinking and drinking, and continued to take the victim’s neck, chest, etc. out of the restaurant.

As a result, the Defendants jointly with D and inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral ley that requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

3. Defendant A’s sole criminal act committed by Defendant A at around 01:45 on the same day, and at the same time and at the place, the captain of the Bupyeong Police Station, who was called out after having received a report of assault, prevented Defendant A, etc. from committing the assault by Defendant A, etc., arrested Defendant A, B, and D as a flagrant offender, and tried to take B out as a flagrant offender, and flap B with his own hand and flap the flap of the J police station, and flap the flap of his head.

As a result, Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of public order and arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant B and D;

1. Each police statement made to J, G and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each injury diagnosis certificate and photographs of the victims' upper part;

1. Criminal facts;