A. On October 25, 2015, the Defendant, at the “E restaurant” located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the Defendant said that G had “dial-a-a-law at the office,” and “G H’s chest” at the seat of the husband of the F and his female operating the said restaurant, but the Defendant did not have a permanent domicile that the said victim G and H had a sexual intercourse or that the chest had a chest.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

B. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant called “G and H have set up the phone at the Hacheon-dong office, G would be good, and G and H are in inhumane relationship.” However, the Defendant did not have a permanent domicile that the victims have sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

(c)

The Defendant made a statement from November 2015 to December 12, 2015, that “G and H have laid her panty at the office,” and the Defendant did not have a permanent domicile that the said victim G and H had a sexual intercourse or have a chest.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the honor of victims by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Each of the facts charged of the instant case is a case in which a prosecution cannot be instituted against the clearly expressed will of the victim (Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act). According to the records, it is recognized that the victims expressed their intent not to punish the defendant in this court (the third trial date) after the prosecution of the instant case. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.