1. On July 21, 2011, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the Defendant’s office located in the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Section C of B Building; (b) at the Defendant’s office located in the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Section B Building; (c) on the unpaid balance column, the Defendant stated “E (E); (d) in the business registration number column, “F” in the name column, “Seoul Songpa-gu G; and the name column of the representative, “D” in the name column, and jointly and severally pays the unpaid balance, the Defendant stated “D”, “H” in the resident registration number column, “H”, and “SAPT J” in the address column, and affixed the seal imprint in advance on D’s name, respectively.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the certificate of attempted balance in the name of D, a private document concerning rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, issued to K a certificate of attempted balance of forged documents as if they were genuinely formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. The statement of each part of the police interrogation protocol against the accused (including D or K substitute part)

1. Statement made by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Statement of each police statement of K and D;

1. Investigation report (the full certificate of the registered matters of the E stock company) and all certificates of registered matters attached thereto;

1. Inquiry request to the head of L/C for inquiry;

1. Business registration certificate for the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning attempted balance and certificate of personal seal impression;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;