However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 20, 2015, around 21:05, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the Defendant, on the ground that the circumstances leading up to the Busan Jin-gu Police Station D police box called out after receiving a 112 report that the Defendant was frighting, and the Defendant demanded the Defendant to invalid; (b) on the ground that the circumstances leading up to the Busan Jin-gu Police Station D police box called out after receiving a frighting report, the Defendant committed assault on the part of

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing photographs and CCTV images CDs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person who has been sentenced] [Determination of sentence] The defendant appears to have the attitude of acknowledging and opposing the crime, the degree of obstruction of performance of official duties, and the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, etc.