If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On February 24, 2011, the Defendant prepared and submitted relevant documents, such as a written application for loans, to the effect that “When the Defendant loans KRW 22 million (36 months of repayment period, KRW 892,260,000,000) to the employees in charge of the loan, he/she will repay each of 892,260 won for 36 months each month, to the employees in charge of the loan, who work in the Section BC of the Solomon Savings Bank, located in the country (State) Dong-gu, Busan.

However, the Defendant did not have worked in the above C, and there was no intention to purchase the Ecuas vehicle, and even if a vehicle was purchased, there was no intention or ability to repay the above 22 million won by selling it as a cuas vehicle immediately called cuascising and selling it, etc.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 22 million from the victim to the single bank account (D) of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to petition for complaint and accompanying documents;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;